About Me

My photo
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Admire John McPhee, Bill Bryson, David Remnick, Thomas Merton, Richard Rohr and James Martin (and most open and curious minds)

31.12.08

BRITON of the YEAR

Can you imagine a U.S. newspaper's ever naming a museum director as its American of the Year?



The London Times has just designated the British Museum's director, Neil MacGregor, as its "Briton of the Year." Barack Obama was the Times' Person of the Year. This is the first time that the Times has bestowed such honors.

Rachel Campbell-Johnston, chief art critic of the Times, lauded MacGregor as "a man who had managed---by what often felt like charm and enthusiasm alone---to turn a financial basket case back into a cultural jewel....By emphasising the importance of an international community of inquiry..., he has helped to create a global society that is quite separate from others that constantly get caught up in the squabblings of government and politics."

All true. But the Greeks, Egyptians, and Nigerians, "squabbling" (respectively) over the Elgin Marbles, Rosetta Stone and Benin bronzes, might beg to differ.

The Times profile provides some interesting personal details:


He appears to have little interest in the trappings of his position. He is the first director not to live in a grand apartment on the premises of the British Museum. He owns few paintings---he was spoilt by his time at the National Gallery, he jokes. He turned down a knighthood, though he does not discuss it. And he appears to find his satisfaction and reward in the simple fulfilment of a civic duty.

As for Obama, the Times declared him to be "unusual among modern presidents in coming from the Northern urban Left." I guess if you string together enough modifiers, anyone can be unusual. The key thing about Obama, though, from the American perspective, is that he "comes from" a wide variety of places.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

do you know if this is owned by amazon?

http://amazonbest.blogspot.com/

S. Training said...

More than 62 players are suffering for the mistakes of a few. The many young men in their final years of their academic studies, who may or may not have the chance of a continuing career in the sport of football can only be crushed by the decision to suspend the football program for a year, and what of the young hopefuls planning to enter their first year? They worked long and hard to not only make it onto the football team, but also to get into this University. Should they really be punished along with the guilty??