About Me

My photo
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Admire John McPhee, Bill Bryson, David Remnick, Thomas Merton, Richard Rohr and James Martin (and most open and curious minds)

9.3.20

Holmes page 3

On this day in 1841, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was born. On his ninetieth birthday, in 1931, he celebrated by giving a speech on the radio and getting his photograph taken at the U.S. Supreme Court—though, as the New York Times reported, he insisted on eating his “victuals” first. When the photographers tried to make the justice pose, he refused: “No, nothing like that. You are always trying to make me do something that isn’t real.”
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes on eighty-fifth birthday, 1926. Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.

1897 | Boston

Times Change

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.

The development of our law has gone on for nearly a thousand years, like the development of a plant, each generation taking the inevitable next step, mind, like matter, simply obeying a law of spontaneous growth.

It is perfectly natural and right that it should have been so. Imitation is a necessity of human nature. Most of the things we do, we do for no better reason than that our fathers have done them or that our neighbors do them, and the same is true of a larger part than we suspect of what we think. The reason is a good one, because our short life gives us no time for a better, but it is not the best. It does not follow, because we all are compelled to take on faith at second hand most of the rules on which we base our action and our thought, that each of us may not try to set some corner of his world in the order of reason, or that all of us collectively should not aspire to carry reason as far as it will go throughout the whole domain. In regard to the law, it is true, no doubt, that an evolutionist will hesitate to affirm universal validity for his social ideals, or for the principles which he thinks should be embodied in legislation. He is content if he can prove them best for here and now. He may be ready to admit that he knows nothing about an absolute best in the cosmos, and even that he knows next to nothing about a permanent best for men. Still it is true that a body of law is more rational and more civilized when every rule it contains is referred articulately and definitely to an end which it subserves, and when the grounds for desiring that end are stated or are ready to be stated in words.

No comments: